However, its detection is time consuming and difficult, presenting challenges to editors and publishers who are entrusted with ensuring the integrity of published literature. Plagiarism is common and threatens the integrity of the scientific literature. Our Similarity Check service helps Crossref members prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism by providing immediate feedback regarding a manuscript’s similarity to other published academic and general web content, through reduced-rate access. A service provided by Crossref and powered by iThenticateSimilarity Check provides editors with a user-friendly tool to help detect plagiarism.The journal will check articles for plagiarism (i.e. Users may be unable to submit and review. Users may experience possible degradation or a brief interruption that may last several minutes. The IEEE CrossCheck Portal will have scheduled maintenance on Thursday, 14 October 2021 from 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM EST, 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM PST, and 5:00 PM to 9:00 PM GMT. The service launched in 2008 when we Cross Check Portal Login Page. Some use Similarity Check directly and some as part of a submission system.
![]() ![]() Crosscheck Ithenticate Professional Plagiarism ByFrom this, we checked Google as to whether English is an official language of the country.Each manuscript, as submitted by the author, was analyzed by iThenticate with the bibliography and quotes excluded (termed full manuscript). We excluded commentaries, documents that were generated from our society (these are usually standards and guidelines for laboratories and clinicians), and letters to the editor.We determined the country of origin of the manuscript as inputted into our submission system by the corresponding author. We included reviews, original research, education reports, and brief reports. We and others typically use manual verification, a time-consuming and subjective approach.The present study sought to quantify the extent of plagiarism in submitted manuscripts using iThenticate, assess whether country of origin was correlated with plagiarism, and, finally, optimize the use of iThenticate to increase efficiency of plagiarism detection in a way that balances sensitivity and specificity.Four hundred consecutive manuscripts were submitted to Genetics in Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) from March 2013 to April 2014. Though other studies have noted that journals will reject manuscripts above a certain percentage level of similarity , the nuances involved in differentiating actual plagiarism from legitimate overlap with previously published material mean that a single iThenticate score cannot, in practice, stand alone as a test of plagiarism. Finally, the assessment of plagiarism is highly nuanced and reliance on a single “score” to rule unacceptable levels of copying in or out is rarely workable in practice. Talijansko hrvatski rjecnikIf one sentence was deemed to be plagiarized, the manuscript was scored as plagiarized.Manuscripts flagged by iThenticate were excluded from the iThenticate analysis if they were published after the manuscript was rejected or published by Genetics in Medicine ( GIM).Based on guidelines from COPE (publicationethics.org) and the US Office of Research Integrity ( ), we excluded the following:Sentences that were descriptions of standard or previously published methodologies (with appropriate referencing) or provided standard definitions of terms.Sentences that fell into the category of “How else would you say that?,” recognizing that in some instances almost everyone will say things virtually the same way, because the technical language involved offers little or no alternative.As methods are the most frequently copied section ( 2–4), we did not analyze that section. The number of paragraphs in each section was counted, and the number of plagiarized paragraphs was expressed as a percentage. This version (termed AIRD) was then also analyzed by iThenticate with the bibliography and quotes excluded.Each version of the manuscript that was analyzed and color coded by iThenticate was then analyzed by one author (JRH) for the following criteria:Only the abstract, introduction, results and discussion/conclusion sections were assessed.In areas highlighted by iThenticate, the sentence was deemed plagiarized if 80 % of the words in the sentence were the same as a previously published paper.Each sentence was scored as plagiarized or not in the section, and the number of sentences in the paragraph that were deemed plagiarized was also counted.Each paragraph was separately analyzed in each section and if 80 % of the words in each paragraph were the same as a previously published paper, this was also deemed plagiarized. ![]() Where English is an official language, manuscripts most often came from the USA (10/11 91 %) (Table 1). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.Among submissions from countries in which English is not an official language, China had the highest levels of plagiarism: 23/67 (34 %). All of the statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY), and pROC package in R 3.2.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Best minecraft ghost clientsIThenticateAmong the 66 manuscripts deemed to have plagiarism by manual curation of the full manuscript, the average iThenticate score was 25.8 (range 9–53, SD = 9.9), compared with an average score of 11. For manuscripts deemed not to have plagiarism, it took on average 1 min to manually assess the manuscript (range 1–5 min), a statistically significant difference ( p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorStefanie ArchivesCategories |